e2’s most wanted

This one I got from Auto Dealer Network" InsideDeals@basscompact.com,

I follow the address and it was redicted to http://topsurveyrewards.com/, which display nothing.

I was playing Need For Speed on my Nokia n95. Cool game. And I was getting really good, I can go for a race and win every time. In NFS, you need to qualify yourself from small racing events to the next bigger ones. Of course, the bigger ones offer bigger prize money. And finally, I’m qualified for the biggest racing event. This event offers $5000 cash prize. With the cash prize, you can upgrade your car, or even get a totally new one. And there come a time when all that I needed to do to get bigger, more powerful cars was just to go for a few races. I know that I will win every single race I go. It felt like I can press a button and boom - $5000!

That made me thinking… Wouldn’t it be nice if in business, I can just press a button and make $5000 every time? Sounds like a fantasy. But this really happens in the real world. OK, maybe not a "button" so to speak. But some businesses have put together a system where they can do 1-2-3 and here comes the cash.

The freelancer’s cash button

 I remember talking to one of my friend, who is an accomplished web programmer. He started as a freelancer and later launched a software development company, doing well over $200k every year now. When he was starting out, he taught programming through training companies. Companies and government agencies would send their staff for a one week training to learn PHP, and my friend is the trainier. To him, doing the training is a sure-fire way to generate cash to cover his overhead. He can go out and do a 1-week course (which he’s done dozens of times) and come back with $1000 in hand. The rest of the months, he spends building his actual business, which is developing custom software. And later, students who came for the training recommended him when their company needed any custom software development. It turns out, their company were preparing staffs for new web projects. They need their staff to be able to manage the project later. Not develop, just manage. So they turn to the first guy they know who can develop a custom software for them.

Another example - the funded proposal system

Business is all about systems. If you’ve been struggling in business, then you ought to stop and look at what you are doing now. [+] What are you doing to get customers to you? [+] What are you doing for long-term success? [+] Do you have your own instant cash button? One time ago I learned about the Funded Proposal System. From my point of view, a funded proposal system is a lead-generation-cum-instant-cash. How does it work? You create a report and sell it. When you sell your report, you make some money up front. That should cover for your operations. But what you are really after is customers to buy bigger things from you. If you are in web design, maybe you can write a book about how to effectively manage a company’s website. But your aim is to generate leads, and later design clients. Your long-term is of course the hosting, maintenance fee and repeat sales. This is similar to the freelance programmer story. The only thing is that he’s doing training rather than writing a book but both serve the same purpose.

Positioning yourself as the expert

If you really think about this, both stories that I told you about, they are positioning themselves as the expert. When people see you as the expert, they will come to you instead you go looking for them. The easiest way to make money (online of offline) is to get people look like an expert. If you are not an expert, then become one. It’s not that hard to do. OK, maybe it’s better to start with something that you are familiar with.

Finding your own cash button

Some people are really good with the online. They can put together a book and use PPC to drive traffic. But don’t stop there. Your ebook should lead you to bigger sales. Because it’s a lot fast to make more with bigger sales. I mean, it’s better to have two clients paying you $5000 than having 10 clients paying you $1000. Yes, the two clients you have will be demanding because they paid you a very high price. And you should deliver something worth the money they paid for. But that is nothing like the headache of handling 10 clients paying you only $1000 each. Well, you should consider this and price yourself wisely. But the point about this whole post is to get you to think. What you should do is start thinking about your cash button and after that, conver those into bigger sales. That is how you grow a business.

Most of the hunting and gathering societies studied in the eighteenth to twentieth centuries had technologies similar to those that were widespread in the Mesolithic period, which occurred about 15,000 to 10,000 years ago, after the ice ages ended but before cultivation was invented and animals domesticated.

Modern hunters live in marginal forest, mountain, arctic, or desert environments where cultivation is impracticable.  Although by no means "primeval," the hunters of recent times do offer clues to the types of family found during that 99 percent of human history before the agricultural revolution.  They include the Eskimo, many Canadian and South American Indian groups, the forest BaMbuti (Pygmies) and the desert Bushmen of Southern Africa, the Kadar of South India, the Veddah of Ceylon, and the Andaman Islanders of the Indian Ocean.  About 175 hunting and gathering cultures in Oceania, Asia, Africa, and America have been described in fair detail.

In spite of their varied environments, hunters share certain features of social life.  They live in bands of about 20 to 200 people, the majority of bands having fewer than 50.  Bands are divide into families, which may forage alone in some seasons.  Hunters have simple but ingenious technologies.  Bows and arrows, spears, needles, skin clothing, and temporary leaf or wood shelters are common.  Most hunters do some fishing.  The band forages and hunts in a large territory and usually moves camp often.

Social life is egalitarian.  There is of course no state no organized government.  Apart from religious shamans or magicians, the division of labor is based only on sex and age.  Resources are owned communally; tools and personal possessions are freely exchanged.  Everyone works who can.  Band leadership goes to whichever man has the intelligence, courage, and foresight to command the respect of his fellows.  Intelligent older women are also looked up to.

The household is the main unit of economic cooperation, with the men, women, and children dividing the labor and pooling their produce.  In 97 percent of the 175 societies, hunting is confined to men; in other 3 percent it is chiefly a male pursuit.  Gathering of wild plants, fruits, and nuts is women’s work.  In 60 percent of societies, only women gather, while in another 32 percent gathering is mainly feminine.  Fishing is solely or mainly men’s work in 93 percent of the hunting societies where it occurs.

For the rest, men monopolize fighting, although interband warfare is rare.  Women tend children and shelters and usually do most of the cooking, processing, and storage of food.  Women tend, also, to be foremost in the early household crafts such as basketry, leather work, the making of skin or bark clothing, and, the more advanced hunting societies, pottery.  (Considering that women probably invented all of these crafts, in addition to cookery, food storage, and preservation, agriculture, spinning, weaving, and perhaps even house construction, it is clear that women played quite as important roles as men in early cultural development.)  Building dwellings and making tools and ornaments are variously divided between the sexes, while boat building is largely done by men.  Girls help the women, and boys play at hunting or hunt small game until they reach puberty, when both take on the roles of adults.  Where the environment makes it desirable, the men of a whole band or of some smaller cluster of households cooperate in hunting or fishing and divide their spoils.  Women of nearby families often go gathering together.

The change to humanness brought two bodily changes that affected birth and child care. These were head size and width of the pelvis. Walking upright produced a narrower pelvis to hold the guts in position. Yet as language developed, brains and hence heads grew much bigger relative to body size. To compensate, humans are born at an earlier stage of growth than apes. They are helpless longer and require longer and more total care. This in turn caused early women to concentrate more on child care and less on defense than do female apes.

Language made possible not only a division and cooperation in labor but also all forms of tradition, rules, morality, and cultural learning. Rules banning sex relations among close kinfolk must have come very early. Precisely how or why they developed is unknown, but they had at least two useful functions. They helped to preserve order in the family as a cooperative unit by outlawing competition for mates. They also created bonds between families, or even between separate bands, and so provided a basis for wider cooperation in the struggle for livelihood and the expansion of knowledge.

It is not clear when all these changes took place. Climatic change with increased drought began regionally up to 28 million years ago. The divergence between prehuman and gorilla-chimpanzees stems had occurred in both Africa and India at least 12 million years ago. The prehuman stem lead to the Australopithecenes of East and South Africa, about 1,750,000 years ago. These were pigmylike, two-footed, upright hominids with larger than ape brains, who made tools and probably hunted in savannah regions. It is unlikely that they knew the use of fire.

The first known use of fire is that of cave-dwelling hominids (Sinanthropus, a branch of the Pithecanthropines) at Choukoutien near Peking, some half a million years ago during the second ice age. Fire was used regularly in hearths, suggesting cookery, by the time of the Acheulean and Mousterian cultures of Neanderthal man in Europe, Africa, and Asia before, during, and after the third ice age, some 150,000 to 100,000 years ago. These people, too, were often cave dwellers and buried their dead ceremonially in caves. Cave dwelling by night as well as by day was probably, in fact, not safe for humans until fire came into use to drive away predators.

Most anthropologists conclude that home life, the family and language had developed by the time of Neanderthal man, who was closely similar and may have been ancestral to modern homo sapiens. Some anthropologists believe that the Australopithecenes already had language nearly 2 million years ago, while another thinks that language and incest prohibitions did not evolve until the time of homo sapiens some 70,000 to 50,000 years ago. It seems that family life built around tool use, the use of language, cookery, and a sexual division of labor must have been established sometime between about 500,000 and 200,000 years ago.

Judging from the fossil record, apes ancestral to humans, gorillas, and chimpanzees roamed widely in Asia, Europe, and Africa some 12 to 28 million years ago. Toward the end of that period (the Miocene) one appears in North India and East Africa, Ramapithecus, who may be ancestral both to later hominids and to modern humans. His species were small like gibbons, walked upright on two feet, had human rather than ape cornerteeth, and therefore probably used hands rather than teeth to tear their food. From that time evolution toward humanness must have proceeded through various phases until the emergence of modern homo sapiens, about 70,000 years ago.

In the Miocene period before Ramapithecus appeared, there were several time spans in which, over large areas, the climate became dryer and subtropical forests dwindled or disappeared. A standard reconstruction of events is that groups of apes, probably in Africa, had to come down from the trees and adapt to terrestrial life. Through natural selection, probably over million of years, they developed specialized feet for walking. Thus freed, the hands came to be used not only (as among apes) for grasping and tearing, but for regular carrying of objects such as weapons (which had hitherto been sporadic) or of infants (which had hitherto clung to their mothers’ body hair.

The spread of indigestible grasses on the open savannahs may have encouraged, if it did not compel, the early ground dwellers to become active hunters rather than simply to forage for small, sick, or dead animals that came their way. Collective hunting and tool use involved group cooperation and helped foster the growth of language out of the call systems of apes. Language meant the use of symbols to refer to events not present. It allowed greatly increased foresight, memory, planning, and division of tasks – in short, the capacity for human thought.

With the change to hunting, group territories became much larger. Apes range only a few thousand feet daily; hunters, several miles. But because their infants were helpless, nursing women could hunt only small game close to home. This then produced the sexual division of labor on which the human family has since been founded. Women elaborated upon ape methods of child care and greatly expanded foraging, which in most areas remained the primary and most stable source of food. Men improved upon ape methods of fighting off other animals and of group protection in general. They adapted these methods to hunting, using weapons which for millennia remained the same for the chase as for human warfare.

Out of the sexual division of labor came, for the first time, home life as well as group cooperation. Female apes nest with and provide foraged food for their infants. But adult apes do not cooperate in food getting or nest building. They build new nests each night wherever they may happen to be. With the development of hunting-gathering complex, it became necessary to have a G.H.Q., or home. Men could bring meat to this place for several days’ supply. Women and children could meet men there after the days’ hunting and could bring their vegetable produce for general consumption. Men, women, and children could build joint shelters, butcher meat, and treat skins for clothing.

Later, fire came into use for protection against wild animals, for lighting, and eventually for cooking. The hearth then provided the focus and symbol of home. With the development of cookery, some humans – chiefly women and perhaps some children and old men – came to spend more time preparing nutrition so that all people need spend less time in chewing and tearing their food. Meals – already less frequent because of the change to a carnivorous diet – now became brief, periodic events instead of the long feeding sessions of apes.